Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (Oct 2018)

Suppression of lung cancer progression by isoliquiritigenin through its metabolite 2, 4, 2’, 4’-Tetrahydroxychalcone

  • Changliang Chen,
  • Anitha K. Shenoy,
  • Ravi Padia,
  • Dongdong Fang,
  • Qing Jing,
  • Ping Yang,
  • Shi-Bing Su,
  • Shuang Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0902-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Licorice is an herb extensively used for both culinary and medicinal purposes. Various constituents of licorice have been shown to exhibit anti-tumorigenic effect in diverse cancer types. However, majority of these studies focus on the aspect of their growth-suppressive role. In this study, we systematically analyzed known licorice’s constituents on the goal of identifying component(s) that can effectively suppress both cell migration and growth. Methods Effect of licorice’s constituents on cell growth was evaluated by MTT assay while cell migration was assessed by both wound-healing and Transwell assays. Cytoskeleton reorganization and focal adhesion assembly were visualized by immunofluorescence staining with labeled phalloidin and anti-paxillin antibody. Activity of Src in cells was judged by western blot using phosphor-Src416 antibody while Src kinase activity was measured using Promega Src kinase assay system. Anti-tumorigenic capabilities of isoliquiritigenin (ISL) and 2, 4, 2′, 4’-Tetrahydroxychalcone (THC) were investigated using lung cancer xenograft model. Results Using a panel of lung cancer cell lines, ISL was identified as the only licorice’s constituent capable of inhibiting both cell migration and growth. ISL-led inhibition in cell migration resulted from impaired cytoskeleton reorganization and focal adhesion assembly. Assessing the phosphorylation of 141 cytoskeleton dynamics-associated proteins revealed that ISL reduced the abundance of Tyr421-phosphorylation of cortactin, Tyr925- and Tyr861-phosphorylation of FAK, indicating the involvement of Src because these sites are known to be phosphorylated by Src. Enigmatically, ISL inhibited Src in cells while displayed no effect on Src activity in cell-free system. The discrepancy was explained by the observation that THC, one of the major ISL metabolite identified in lung cancer cells abrogated Src activity both in cells and cell-free system. Similar to ISL, THC deterred cell migration and abolished cytoskeleton reorganization/focal adhesion assembly. Furthermore, we showed both ISL and THC suppressed in vitro lung cancer cell invasion and in vivo tumor progression. Conclusion Our study suggests that ISL inhibits lung cancer cell migration and tumorigenesis by interfering with Src through its metabolite THC. As licorice is safely used for culinary purposes, our study suggests that ISL or THC may be safely used as a Src inhibitor.

Keywords