Diabetes ROADMAP: Teaching Guideline Use, Communication, and Documentation When Delivering the Diagnosis of Diabetes
Christy J. W. Ledford,
Dean A. Seehusen,
Lauren A. Cafferty,
Heather A. Rider,
Tyler Rogers,
Stephanie Fulleborn,
Erik Clauson,
Christopher C. Ledford,
Steven Trigg,
Jeremy T. Jackson,
Paul F. Crawford
Affiliations
Christy J. W. Ledford
Associate Professor, Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Dean A. Seehusen
Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education and Professor of Family Medicine, Augusta University
Lauren A. Cafferty
Clinical Research Coordinator, Military Primary Care Research Network, Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation
Heather A. Rider
Research Coordinator, Clinical Investigations Program, Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center
Tyler Rogers
Leader and Faculty Development Fellow, Madigan Army Medical Center
Stephanie Fulleborn
Resident Physician, Family Medicine, Eglin Air Force Base Family Medicine Residency
Erik Clauson
Staff Physician, Family Medicine, Eglin Air Force Base Family Medicine Residency
Christopher C. Ledford
Staff Physician, Family Medicine, Eglin Air Force Base Family Medicine Residency
Steven Trigg
Resident Physician, Family Medicine, Eglin Air Force Base Family Medicine Residency
Jeremy T. Jackson
Publications Coordinator, Military Primary Care Research Network, Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation
Paul F. Crawford
Professor of Family Medicine, Military Primary Care Research Network, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and Nellis Air Force Base Family Medicine Residency
Introduction Most interventions to date regarding breaking bad news focus on late-stage disease or disclosing a cancer diagnosis. Little attention has been given to delivery of chronic metabolic disease diagnoses such as prediabetes/type 2 diabetes. Methods Informed by the American Diabetes Association standards of care and formative research conducted by our research team, we developed this curriculum through the six-step approach to curriculum development. The curriculum consists of a 2- or 3-hour intervention that teaches medical decision-making, interpersonal communication, and clinical documentation in the context of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes followed by role-play and clinical practice. Results Across three cohorts, 53 clinicians completed the curriculum. Across the three iterations, learners rated the curricular intervention as worthwhile and delivered at an appropriate level. In a community hospital setting, learners scored significantly higher on a knowledge check than did a control group of six clinicians (p < .001). Learners in the community hospital also indicated high response efficacy and self-efficacy. At the academic medical center, simulated patients indicated high measures on the Diabetes Health Threat Communication Questionnaire. Discussion The moment of diagnosis presents a key opportunity to affect patients' perceptions of the disease. This curriculum guides clinicians in making the most of diagnosis delivery. Pairing of qualitative, patient-centered research alongside the iterative curriculum design process allows the curriculum to be adaptable and scalable to multiple settings and learner types.