BMC Genomics (Sep 2011)

A comparative physical map reveals the pattern of chromosomal evolution between the turkey (<it>Meleagris gallopavo</it>) and chicken (<it>Gallus gallus</it>) genomes

  • Delany Mary E,
  • Lee Mi-Kyung,
  • Huang James J,
  • Zhang Meiping,
  • Scheuring Chantel F,
  • Dong Jennifer J,
  • Payne William S,
  • O'Hare Thomas H,
  • Zhang Xiaojun,
  • Zhang Yang,
  • Zhang Hong-Bin,
  • Dodgson Jerry B

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-447
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
p. 447

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background A robust bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based physical map is essential for many aspects of genomics research, including an understanding of chromosome evolution, high-resolution genome mapping, marker-assisted breeding, positional cloning of genes, and quantitative trait analysis. To facilitate turkey genetics research and better understand avian genome evolution, a BAC-based integrated physical, genetic, and comparative map was developed for this important agricultural species. Results The turkey genome physical map was constructed based on 74,013 BAC fingerprints (11.9 × coverage) from two independent libraries, and it was integrated with the turkey genetic map and chicken genome sequence using over 41,400 BAC assignments identified by 3,499 overgo hybridization probes along with > 43,000 BAC end sequences. The physical-comparative map consists of 74 BAC contigs, with an average contig size of 13.6 Mb. All but four of the turkey chromosomes were spanned on this map by three or fewer contigs, with 14 chromosomes spanned by a single contig and nine chromosomes spanned by two contigs. This map predicts 20 to 27 major rearrangements distinguishing turkey and chicken chromosomes, despite up to 40 million years of separate evolution between the two species. These data elucidate the chromosomal evolutionary pattern within the Phasianidae that led to the modern turkey and chicken karyotypes. The predominant rearrangement mode involves intra-chromosomal inversions, and there is a clear bias for these to result in centromere locations at or near telomeres in turkey chromosomes, in comparison to interstitial centromeres in the orthologous chicken chromosomes. Conclusion The BAC-based turkey-chicken comparative map provides novel insights into the evolution of avian genomes, a framework for assembly of turkey whole genome shotgun sequencing data, and tools for enhanced genetic improvement of these important agricultural and model species.