The Pan African Medical Journal (Apr 2016)

Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco

  • Soukayna Benzouina,
  • Mohamed El-mahdi Boubkraoui,
  • Mustapha Mrabet,
  • Naima Chahid,
  • Aicha Kharbach,
  • Amine El-hassani,
  • Amina Barkat

DOI
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.197.7401
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 197

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION: perinatal mortality rates have come down in cesarean sections, but fetal morbidity is still high in comparison to vaginal delivery and the complications are more commonly seen in emergency than in elective cesarean sections. The objective is to compare the fetal outcome and the indications in elective versus emergency cesarean section performed in a tertiary maternity hospital. METHODS: this comparative cross-sectional prospective study of all the cases undergoing elective and emergency cesarean section for any indication at Souissi maternity hospital of Rabat, Morocco, was carried from January 1, to February 28, 2014. Data were analyzed with emphasis on fetal outcome and cesarean sections indications. Mothers who had definite antenatal complications that would adversely affect fetal outcome were excluded from the study. RESULTS: there was 588 (17.83%) cesarean sections among 3297 births of which emergency cesarean section accounted for 446 (75.85%) and elective cesarean section for 142 cases (24.15%). Of the various factors analyzed in relation to the two types of cesarean sections, statistically significant associations were found between emergency cesarean section and younger mothers (P=0.001), maternal illiteracy (P=0.049), primiparity (P=0.005), insufficient prenatal care (P=0.001), referral from other institution for pregnancy complications or delivery (P=0.001), cesarean section performed under general anesthesia (P=0.001), lower birth weight (P=0.016), neonatal morbidity and early mortality (P=0.001), and admission in neonatal intensive care unit (P=0.024). The commonest indication of emergency cesarean section was fetal distress (30.49%), while the most frequent indication in elective cesarean section was previous cesarean delivery (47.18%). CONCLUSION: the overall fetal complications rate was higher in emergency cesarean section than in elective cesarean section. Early recognition and referral of mothers who are likely to undergo cesarean section may reduce the incidence of emergency cesarean sections and thus decrease fetal complications.

Keywords