Dual inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK conquers MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers by accumulating DNA damage

Abstract

Abstract Background KRAS mutations frequently occur in cancers, particularly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Although KRAS G12C inhibitors have recently been approved, effective precision therapies have not yet been established for all KRAS-mutant cancers. Many treatments for KRAS-mutant cancers, including epigenome-targeted drugs, are currently under investigation. Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins are a family of small proteins covalently attached to and detached from other proteins in cells via the processes called SUMOylation and de-SUMOylation. We assessed whether SUMOylation inhibition was effective in KRAS-mutant cancer cells. Methods The efficacy of the first-in-class SUMO-activating enzyme E inhibitor TAK-981 (subasumstat) was assessed in multiple human and mouse KRAS-mutated cancer cell lines. A gene expression assay using a TaqMan array was used to identify biomarkers of TAK-981 efficacy. The biological roles of SUMOylation inhibition and subsequent regulatory mechanisms were investigated using immunoblot analysis, immunofluorescence assays, and mouse models. Results We discovered that TAK-981 downregulated the expression of the currently undruggable MYC and effectively suppressed the growth of MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers across different tissue types. Moreover, TAK-981-resistant cells were sensitized to SUMOylation inhibition via MYC-overexpression. TAK-981 induced proteasomal degradation of MYC by altering the balance between SUMOylation and ubiquitination and promoting the binding of MYC and Fbxw7, a key factor in the ubiquitin–proteasome system. The efficacy of TAK-981 monotherapy in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models using a mouse-derived CMT167 cell line was significant but modest. Since MAPK inhibition of the KRAS downstream pathway is crucial in KRAS-mutant cancer, we expected that co-inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK might be a good option. Surprisingly, combination treatment with TAK-981 and trametinib dramatically induced apoptosis in multiple cell lines and gene-engineered mouse-derived organoids. Moreover, combination therapy resulted in long-term tumor regression in mouse models using cell lines of different tissue types. Finally, we revealed that combination therapy complementally inhibited Rad51 and BRCA1 and accumulated DNA damage. Conclusions We found that MYC downregulation occurred via SUMOylation inhibition in KRAS-mutant cancer cells. Our findings indicate that dual inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK may be a promising treatment for MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers by enhancing DNA damage accumulation.

Keywords

• KRAS
• MYC
• SUMOylation
• MEK
• DNA damage