Urology Annals (Jan 2018)

Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?

  • Abdulhakim Al Otay,
  • Osama Sarhan,
  • Hossam S El-Tholoth,
  • Ahmed Alhelaly,
  • Hamad Al Akrash,
  • Mustafa Al Ghanbar,
  • Khaled Al Bedaiwi,
  • Ziad Nakshabandi,
  • Ali Obeid

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_116_17
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
pp. 287 – 290

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: The aim is to assess the outcomes of different approaches for the management of renal stones associated with horseshoe kidneys (HSKs) in our institution over a 12-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of 144 patients with HSKs who presented from 2000 to 2012 was performed. Twenty-eight patients (19.4%) were found to have renal stones. Demographic data were collected; the method of treatment and the outcomes of stone management were reviewed. We excluded patients with non-functioning moieties and associated genitourinary anomalies, and those with incomplete data. Results: We included 25 patients, of which 16 males (64%) and 9 females (36%), with a mean age of 37 years. Mean serum creatinine level was 66 mmol/L. Eleven patients with a stone size 2 cm were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One patient with a 10 mm stone was treated using flexible ureteroscopy. No significant perioperative complications were encountered. Conclusions: Indications, methods of treatment, and outcomes of management of stones associated with HSKs were comparable to those for stones associated with normal kidneys. Tailored approach based on stone size is highly recommended. ESWL accompanied with ureteric stenting is a promising strategy for the management of stones associated with HSKs in selected patients requiring intervention.

Keywords