Turkish Journal of Hematology (May 2022)

Comprehensive Mutation Profile in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 Fusions

  • Wei Qin,
  • Xiayu Chen,
  • Hong Jie Shen,
  • Zheng Wang,
  • Xiaohui Cai,
  • Naike Jiang,
  • Haiying Hua

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2022.2021.0641
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 39, no. 2
pp. 84 – 93

Abstract

Read online

Objective: This study was undertaken with the aim of better understanding the genomic landscape of core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 112 genes that were detected using next-generation sequencing in 134 patients with de novo CBF-AML. FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and CEBPA mutations were detected by DNA-PCR and Sanger sequencing. Results: In the whole cohort, the most commonly mutated genes were c-KIT (33.6%) and NRAS (33.6%), followed by FLT3 (18.7%), KRAS (13.4%), RELN (8.2%), and NOTCH1 (8.2%). The frequencies of mutated genes associated with epigenetic modification, such as IDH1, IDH2, DNMT3A, and TET2, were low, being present in 1.5%, 0.7%, 2.2%, and 7.5% of the total number of patients, respectively. Inv(16)/t(16;16) AML patients exhibited more mutations of NRAS and KRAS (p=0.001 and 0.0001, respectively) than t(8;21) AML patients. Functionally mutated genes involved in signaling pathways were observed more frequently in the inv(16)/t(16;16) AML group (p=0.016), while the mutations involved in cohesin were found more frequently in the t(8;21) AML group (p=0.011). Significantly higher white blood cell counts were found in inv(16)/t(16;16) AML patients with c-KIT (c-KITmut) or NRAS (NRASmut) mutations compared to the corresponding t(8;21) AML/c-KITmut and t(8;21) AML/NRASmut groups (p=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: The mutation profiles of t(8;21) AML patients showed evident differences from those of patients with inv(16)/t(16;16) AML. We have provided a comprehensive overview of the mutational landscape of CBF-AML.

Keywords