PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Inter-vendor reproducibility of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 3 Tesla.

  • Henri J M M Mutsaerts,
  • Rebecca M E Steketee,
  • Dennis F R Heijtel,
  • Joost P A Kuijer,
  • Matthias J P van Osch,
  • Charles B L M Majoie,
  • Marion Smits,
  • Aart J Nederveen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104108
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 8
p. e104108

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSE:Prior to the implementation of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in clinical multi-center studies, it is important to establish its status quo inter-vendor reproducibility. This study evaluates and compares the intra- and inter-vendor reproducibility of pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) as clinically implemented by GE and Philips. MATERIAL AND METHODS:22 healthy volunteers were scanned twice on both a 3T GE and a 3T Philips scanner. The main difference in implementation between the vendors was the readout module: spiral 3D fast spin echo vs. 2D gradient-echo echo-planar imaging respectively. Mean and variation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) were compared for the total gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), and on a voxel-level. RESULTS:Whereas the mean GM CBF of both vendors was almost equal (p = 1.0), the mean WM CBF was significantly different (p<0.01). The inter-vendor GM variation did not differ from the intra-vendor GM variation (p = 0.3 and p = 0.5 for GE and Philips respectively). Spatial inter-vendor CBF and variation differences were observed in several GM regions and in the WM. CONCLUSION:These results show that total GM CBF-values can be exchanged between vendors. For the inter-vendor comparison of GM regions or WM, these results encourage further standardization of ASL implementation among vendors.