Deep learning reconstruction improves computer-aided pulmonary nodule detection and measurement accuracy for ultra-low-dose chest CT

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To compare the image quality and pulmonary nodule detectability and measurement accuracy between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) of chest ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). Materials and Methods Participants who underwent chest standard-dose CT (SDCT) followed by ULDCT from October 2020 to January 2022 were prospectively included. ULDCT images reconstructed with HIR and DLR were compared with SDCT images to evaluate image quality, nodule detection rate, and measurement accuracy using a commercially available deep learning–based nodule evaluation system. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the percentage errors of nodule size and nodule volume between HIR and DLR images. Results Eighty-four participants (54 ± 13 years; 26 men) were finally enrolled. The effective radiation doses of ULDCT and SDCT were 0.16 ± 0.02 mSv and 1.77 ± 0.67 mSv, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean ± standard deviation of the lung tissue noises was 61.4 ± 3.0 HU for SDCT, 61.5 ± 2.8 HU and 55.1 ± 3.4 HU for ULDCT reconstructed with HIR-Strong setting (HIR-Str) and DLR-Strong setting (DLR-Str), respectively (P < 0.001). A total of 535 nodules were detected. The nodule detection rates of ULDCT HIR-Str and ULDCT DLR-Str were 74.0% and 83.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). The absolute percentage error in nodule volume from that of SDCT was 19.5% in ULDCT HIR-Str versus 17.9% in ULDCT DLR-Str (P < 0.001). Conclusion Compared with HIR, DLR reduced image noise, increased nodule detection rate, and improved measurement accuracy of nodule volume at chest ULDCT. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Keywords

• Lung nodules
• Tomography, X-ray computed
• Deep learning reconstruction
• Image quality