Journal of the International AIDS Society (Aug 2024)

Acceptability, usability, and willingness to pay for HIV self‐test kits distributed through community‐based, PLHIV network‐led and private practitioners models in India: Results from the STAR III Initiative

  • Chinmay Laxmeshwar,
  • Asha Hegde,
  • Alpana Dange,
  • Kannan Mariyappan,
  • Manish Soosai,
  • Sandeep Mane,
  • Murugesan Sivasubramanian,
  • Mahesh Doddamane,
  • Madhuri Mukherjee,
  • G. S. Shreenivas,
  • Manoj Pardesi,
  • Vinod Jambhale,
  • Venkateswara Rao Pakkela,
  • Vijayaraman Arumugam,
  • Vedant Rungta,
  • Yashika Bansal,
  • Jatin Chaudary,
  • Vijay Yeldandi,
  • Mahalingam Periasamy,
  • Chengappa Uthappa,
  • Sudhir Chawla,
  • Sunita Upadhyaya,
  • Melissa Nyendak,
  • Venkatesan Chakrapani,
  • Sheela Godbole,
  • Vinita Verma,
  • Bhawani Singh Kushwaha,
  • Chinmoyee Das,
  • Shobini Rajan,
  • Anoop Kumar Puri,
  • J. V. R. Prasada Rao,
  • Tarun Bhatnagar,
  • D. C. S. Reddy,
  • Kimberly Green

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26348
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 27, no. 8
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction HIV self‐testing (HIVST) has been shown to increase the uptake of HIV testing and help achieve the UNAIDS 95‐95‐95 targets. This study assessed the acceptability, usability (ease of use and result interpretation) and the willingness to pay for HIVST kits distributed through three distribution models, namely the community‐based, PLHIV network‐led and private practitioners models, in India. Methods This cross‐sectional study was implemented across 14 states in India between September 2021 and June 2022. All participants could choose between blood‐based or oral‐fluid‐based test kits. Participants were shown a test‐kit usage demonstration video, and pre‐ and post‐test counselling was provided for all. Participants were followed‐up after testing, and if reported reactive, were further supported for linkage to confirmatory testing and antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Results Among the 90,605 participants found eligible, 88,080 (97%) accepted an HIVST kit. Among the 87,976 who reported using an HIVST kit, 45,207 (51%) preferred a blood‐based kit, and 42,120 (48%) reported testing for the first time. For future testing, 77,064 (88%) reported preferring HIVST over other HIV testing methods. Among those who used the kit, 83,308 (95%) found the kit easy to use, and 83,237 (95%) reported that the test results were easy to interpret. Among those who preferred HIVST for future use, 52,136 (69%) were willing to pay for the kit, with 35,854 (69%) of those willing to pay less than US$ 1.20. Only one instance of social harm was reported, with a participant reporting suicidal tendencies due to discord with their partner. Out of 328 participants (0.4%) who tested reactive with HIVST, 291 (89%) were linked to confirmatory testing; of these, 254 were confirmed HIV positive, and 216 (85%) successfully initiated ART. Conclusions Overall, we report that nearly all participants were willing to accept HIVST, found the test kits easy to use and interpret, and about two‐thirds were willing to pay for HIVST. Given the high levels of acceptance and the ability to reach a large proportion of first‐time testers, HIVST in India could contribute to achieving the UNAIDS first 95 and ending the HIV epidemic.

Keywords