Risk factors of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the difference in risk factors between non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and develop a predictive diagnostic nomogram. METHODS: The study included 37 patients with monocular NAION, 20 with monocular CRAO, and 24 with hypertension. Gender, age, and systemic diseases were recorded. Blood routine, lipids, hemorheology, carotid and brachial artery doppler ultrasound, and echocardiography were collected. The optic disc area, cup area, and cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) of the unaffected eye in the NAION and CRAO group and the right eye in the hypertension group were measured. RESULTS: The carotid artery intimal medial thickness (C-IMT) of the affected side of the CRAO group was thicker (P=0.039) and its flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was lower (P=0.049) than the NAION group. Compared with hypertension patients, NAION patients had higher whole blood reduced viscosity low-shear (WBRV-L) and erythrocyte aggregation index (EAI; P=0.045, 0.037), and CRAO patients had higher index of rigidity of erythrocyte (IR) and erythrocyte deformation index (EDI; P=0.004, 0.001). The optic cup and the C/D of the NAION group were smaller than the other two groups (P<0.0001). The diagnostic prediction model showed high diagnostic specificity (83.7%) and sensitivity (85.6%), which was highly related to hypertension, the C-IMT of the affected side, FMD, platelet (PLT), EAI, and C/D. CONCLUSION: CRAO patients show thicker C-IMT and worse endothelial function than NAION. NAION and CRAO may be related to abnormal hemorheology. A small cup and small C/D may be involved in NAION. The diagnostic nomogram can be used to preliminarily identify NAION and CRAO.

Keywords

• non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy
• central retinal artery occlusion
• risk factors
• diagnostic prediction model
• nomogram