International Journal of Public Health (Jul 2024)

Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Preventive Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Switzerland: A Population Based Digital Cohort Analysis

  • Stefano Tancredi,
  • Bernadette W. A. van der Linden,
  • Arnaud Chiolero,
  • Arnaud Chiolero,
  • Arnaud Chiolero,
  • Stéphane Cullati,
  • Stéphane Cullati,
  • Medea Imboden,
  • Medea Imboden,
  • Nicole Probst-Hensch,
  • Nicole Probst-Hensch,
  • Dirk Keidel,
  • Dirk Keidel,
  • Melissa Witzig,
  • Melissa Witzig,
  • Julia Dratva,
  • Julia Dratva,
  • Gisela Michel,
  • Erika Harju,
  • Erika Harju,
  • Irene Frank,
  • Elsa Lorthe,
  • Elsa Lorthe,
  • Hélène Baysson,
  • Silvia Stringhini,
  • Silvia Stringhini,
  • Silvia Stringhini,
  • Silvia Stringhini,
  • Christian R. Kahlert,
  • Christian R. Kahlert,
  • Julia B. Bardoczi,
  • Julia B. Bardoczi,
  • Moa Lina Haller,
  • Patricia O. Chocano-Bedoya,
  • Nicolas Rodondi,
  • Nicolas Rodondi,
  • Rebecca Amati,
  • Emiliano Albanese,
  • Laurie Corna,
  • Luca Crivelli,
  • Luca Crivelli,
  • Marco Kaufmann,
  • Anja Frei,
  • Viktor von Wyl,
  • Viktor von Wyl

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1606861
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 69

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesTo assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and self-reported adherence to preventive measures in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods4,299 participants from a digital cohort were followed between September 2020 and November 2021. Baseline equivalised disposable income and education were used as SES proxies. Adherence was assessed over time. We investigated the association between SES and adherence using multivariable mixed logistic regression, stratifying by age (below/above 65 years) and two periods (before/after June 2021, to account for changes in vaccine coverage and epidemiological situation).ResultsAdherence was high across all SES strata before June 2021. After, participants with higher equivalised disposable income were less likely to adhere to preventive measures compared to participants in the first (low) quartile [second (Adj.OR, 95% CI) (0.56, 0.37–0.85), third (0.38, 0.23–0.64), fourth (0.60, 0.36–0.98)]. We observed similar results for education.ConclusionNo differences by SES were found during the period with high SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates and stringent measures. Following the broad availability of vaccines, lower incidence, and eased measures, differences by SES started to emerge. Our study highlights the need for contextual interpretation when assessing SES impact on adherence to preventive measures.

Keywords