Effect of sequencing platforms on the sensitivity of chemical mutation detection using Hawk-Seq™

Abstract

Abstract Background Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) technologies have enabled the direct evaluation of genome-wide mutations after exposure to mutagens. Previously, we reported an ecNGS methodology, Hawk-Seq™, and demonstrated its utility in evaluating mutagenicity. The evaluation of technical transferability is essential to further evaluate the reliability of ecNGS-based assays. However, cutting-edge sequencing platforms are continually evolving, which can affect the sensitivity of ecNGS. Therefore, the effect of differences in sequencing instruments on mutation data quality should be evaluated. Results We assessed the performance of four sequencing platforms (HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400) with the Hawk-Seq™ protocol for mutagenicity evaluation using DNA samples from mouse bone marrow exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The overall mutation (OM) frequencies per 106 bp in vehicle-treated samples were 0.22, 0.36, 0.46, and 0.26 for HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400, respectively. The OM frequency of NextSeq2000 was significantly higher than that of HiSeq2500, suggesting the difference to be based on the platform. The relatively higher value in NextSeq2000 was a consequence of the G:C to C:G mutations in NextSeq2000 data (0.67 per 106 G:C bp), which was higher than the mean of the four platforms by a ca. of 0.25 per 106 G:C bp. A clear dose-dependent increase in G:C to T:A mutation frequencies was observed in all four sequencing platforms after BP exposure. The cosine similarity values of the 96-dimensional trinucleotide mutation patterns between HiSeq and the three other platforms were 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 for NovaSeq, NextSeq, and DNBSeq, respectively. These results suggest that all platforms can provide equivalent data that reflect the characteristics of the mutagens. Conclusions All platforms sensitively detected mutagen-induced mutations using the Hawk-Seq™ analysis. The substitution types and frequencies of the background errors differed depending on the platform. The effects of sequencing platforms on mutagenicity evaluation should be assessed before experimentation.

Keywords

• Next generation sequencing
• Error-corrected sequencing
• Mutagenicity assay
• Mutational signatures