Journal of Hematology & Oncology (Jun 2023)

A novel non-invasive exhaled breath biopsy for the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer

  • Jiaqi Liu,
  • Haibin Chen,
  • Yalun Li,
  • Yanman Fang,
  • Yang Guo,
  • Shuangquan Li,
  • Juan Xu,
  • Ziqi Jia,
  • Jiali Zou,
  • Gang Liu,
  • Hengyi Xu,
  • Tao Wang,
  • Dingyuan Wang,
  • Yiwen Jiang,
  • Yang Wang,
  • Xuejie Tang,
  • Guangdong Qiao,
  • Yeqing Zhou,
  • Lan Bai,
  • Ran Zhou,
  • Can Lu,
  • Hongwei Wen,
  • Jiayi Li,
  • Yansong Huang,
  • Shuo Zhang,
  • Yong Feng,
  • Hongyan Chen,
  • Shouping Xu,
  • Bailin Zhang,
  • Zhihua Liu,
  • Xiang Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01459-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Early detection is critical for improving the survival of breast cancer (BC) patients. Exhaled breath testing as a non-invasive technique might help to improve BC detection. However, the breath test accuracy for BC diagnosis is unclear. Methods This multi-center cohort study consecutively recruited 5047 women from four areas of China who underwent BC screening. Breath samples were collected through standardized breath collection procedures. Volatile organic compound (VOC) markers were identified from a high-throughput breathomics analysis by the high-pressure photon ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS). Diagnostic models were constructed using the random forest algorithm in the discovery cohort and tested in three external validation cohorts. Results A total of 465 (9.21%) participants were identified with BC. Ten optimal VOC markers were identified to distinguish the breath samples of BC patients from those of non-cancer women. A diagnostic model (BreathBC) consisting of 10 optimal VOC markers showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 in external validation cohorts. BreathBC-Plus, which combined 10 VOC markers with risk factors, achieved better performance (AUC = 0.94 in the external validation cohorts), superior to that of mammography and ultrasound. Overall, the BreathBC-Plus detection rates were 96.97% for ductal carcinoma in situ, 85.06%, 90.00%, 88.24%, and 100% for stages I, II, III, and IV BC, respectively, with a specificity of 87.70% in the external validation cohorts. Conclusions This is the largest study on breath tests to date. Considering the easy-to-perform procedure and high accuracy, these findings exemplify the potential applicability of breath tests in BC screening.

Keywords