Frontiers in Oncology (Aug 2024)

Thoracic radiation in combination with erlotinib—results from a phase 2 randomized trial

  • Hanne Marte Nymoen,
  • Hanne Marte Nymoen,
  • Hanne Marte Nymoen,
  • Tine Norman Alver,
  • Tine Norman Alver,
  • Henrik Horndalsveen,
  • Henrik Horndalsveen,
  • Henrik Horndalsveen,
  • Hanne Astrid Eide,
  • Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs,
  • Odd Terje Brustugun,
  • Odd Terje Brustugun,
  • Odd Terje Brustugun,
  • Bjørn Henning Grønberg,
  • Bjørn Henning Grønberg,
  • Vilde Drageset Haakensen,
  • Vilde Drageset Haakensen,
  • Vilde Drageset Haakensen,
  • Åslaug Helland,
  • Åslaug Helland,
  • Åslaug Helland

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1412716
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) can be used to reduce symptoms and maintain open airways for patients with non-small cell lung cancer when systemic treatment is not sufficient. For some patients, tumor control is not achieved due to radioresistance. Concurrent inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptors has been proposed as a strategy to overcome radioresistance but may increase toxicity. We performed a randomized trial to assess the efficacy, tolerance, and quality of life of concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to RT alone (arm A) or in combination with erlotinib (arm B). A computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline and one at 4–12 weeks after inclusion was used to evaluate treatment response. Adverse events were registered during treatment and the subsequent 30 days. Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by the patients at baseline, weeks 2, 6, and 20.ResultsA total of 114 patients were included. Of the 74 patients with CT scans available for evaluation of treatment effect, there were no significant differences in tumor size reduction between the two groups: median 14.5% reduction in the control arm A and 17.0% in the erlotinib arm B (p = 0.68). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two treatment arms: 7.0 and 7.8 months in arm A and arm B, respectively (log-rank p = 0.32). There was no significant increase in adverse events in the experimental arm, other than what is expected from erlotinib treatment alone. Overall, patients reported similar quality of life in both treatment arms.ConclusionConcurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated but did not improve the efficacy of the RT.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02714530.

Keywords