Comparing the volume of vascular intersection of two femoral neck fracture fixation implants using an In silico technique

Abstract

Background:. Femoral neck fracture displacement with subsequent vascular disruption is one of the factors that contribute to trauma-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Iatrogenic damage of the intraosseous arterial system during fixation of femoral neck fracture is another possible cause of avascular necrosis that is less well understood. Recently, Zhao et al (2017) reconstructed 3D structures of intraosseous blood supply and identified the epiphyseal and inferior retinacular arterial system to be important structures for maintaining the femoral head blood supply after femoral neck fracture. The authors therefore recommended placing implants centrally to reduce iatrogenic vascular injuries. Our in vitro study compared the spatial footprint of a traditional dynamic hip screw with an antirotation screw versus a newly developed hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw on intraosseous vasculature. Methods:. Three dimensional (3D) µCT angiograms of 9 cadaveric proximal femora were produced. Three segmented volumes—porous or cancellous bone, filled or cortical bone, and intraosseous vasculature—were converted to surface files. 3D in silico models of the fixation systems were sized and implanted in silico without visibility of the vascular maps. The volume of vasculature that overlapped with the devices was determined. The ratio of the vascular intersection to the comparator device was calculated, and the mean ratio was determined. A paired design, noninferiority test was used to compare the devices. Results:. Results indicate both significant (P < 0.001) superiority and noninferiority of the hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw when compared with a dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw for the volume of vasculature that overlapped with each device in the femoral neck. Conclusions:. Combining established methods of vascular visualization with newer methods enables an implant's impact on vascular intersection to be assessed in silico. This methodology suggests that when used for femoral neck fracture management, the new device intersects fewer blood vessels than the comparator. Comparative clinical studies are needed to investigate whether these findings correlate with the incidence of avascular necrosis and clinical outcomes.