[68Ga]Ga‑PSMA‑617 PET-based radiomics model to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with GGG 1–2 prostate cancer at biopsy

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To develop a radiomics-based model using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT to predict postoperative adverse pathology (AP) in patients with biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1–2 prostate cancer (PCa), assisting in the selection of patients for active surveillance (AS). Methods A total of 75 men with biopsy GGG 1–2 PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into a training group (70%) and a testing group (30%). Radiomics features of entire prostate were extracted from the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET scans and selected using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to construct the prediction models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve were employed to evaluate the diagnostic value, clinical utility, and predictive accuracy of the models, respectively. Results Among the 75 patients, 30 had AP confirmed by RP. The clinical model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 (0.695–0.947) in the training set and 0.795 (0.603–0.987) in the testing set. The radiomics model achieved AUC values of 0.830 (0.720–0.941) in the training set and 0.829 (0.624–1.000) in the testing set. The combined model, which incorporated the Radiomics score (Radscore) and free prostate-specific antigen (FPSA)/total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA), demonstrated higher diagnostic efficacy than both the clinical and radiomics models, with AUC values of 0.875 (0.780–0.970) in the training set and 0.872 (0.678–1.000) in the testing set. DCA showed that the net benefits of the combined model and radiomics model exceeded those of the clinical model. Conclusion The combined model shows potential in stratifying men with biopsy GGG 1–2 PCa based on the presence of AP at final pathology and outperforms models based solely on clinical or radiomics features. It may be expected to aid urologists in better selecting suitable patients for AS.

Keywords

• Prostate cancer
• Active surveillance
• Positron-emission tomography
• Radiomics