Frontiers in Oncology (Feb 2023)

Construction and validation of a novel nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

  • Guole Nie,
  • Honglong Zhang,
  • Jun Yan,
  • Jun Yan,
  • Jun Yan,
  • Danna Xie,
  • Haijun Zhang,
  • Xun Li,
  • Xun Li,
  • Xun Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1114847
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Background and aimsAdenocarcinoma is one of the most common pathological types of gastric cancer. The aims of this study were to develop and validate prognostic nomograms that could predict the probability of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients at 1, 3, and 5 years.MethodsIn total, 7747 patients with GAC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015, and 4591 patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. The 7747 patients were used as a prognostic cohort to explore GAC-related prognostic risk factors. Moreover, the 4591 patients were used for external validation. The prognostic cohort was also divided into a training and internal validation sets for construction and internal validation of the nomogram. CSS predictors were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis. A prognostic model was built using Cox hazard regression analysis and provided as static and dynamic network-based nomograms.ResultsThe primary site, tumor grade, surgery of the primary site, T stage, N stage, and M stage were determined to be independent prognostic factors for CSS and were subsequently included in construction of the nomogram. CSS was accurately estimated using the nomogram at 1, 3, and 5 years. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for the training group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.816, 0.853, and 0.863, respectively. Following internal validation, these values were 0.817, 0.851, and 0.861. Further, the AUC of the nomogram was much greater than that of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) or SEER staging. Moreover, the anticipated and actual CSS values were in good agreement based on decision curves and time-calibrated plots. Then, patients from the two subgroups were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on this nomogram. The survival rate of high-risk patients was considerably lower than that of low-risk patients, according to Kaplan–Meier (K-M) curves (p<0.0001).ConclusionsA reliable and convenient nomogram in the form of a static nomogram or an online calculator was constructed and validated to assist physicians in quantifying the probability of CSS in GAC patients.

Keywords