Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Mar 2024)

Efficacy and Safety of HepaSphere Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy as the Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Liu B,
  • Gao S,
  • Guo J,
  • Kou F,
  • Liu S,
  • Zhang X,
  • Feng A,
  • Wang X,
  • Cao G,
  • Chen H,
  • Liu P,
  • Xu H,
  • Gao Q,
  • Yang R,
  • Xu L,
  • Zhu X

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 11
pp. 477 – 488

Abstract

Read online

Baojiang Liu,* Song Gao,* Jianhai Guo, Fuxin Kou, Shaoxing Liu, Xin Zhang, Aiwei Feng, Xiaodong Wang, Guang Cao, Hui Chen, Peng Liu, Haifeng Xu, Qinzong Gao, Renjie Yang, Liang Xu, Xu Zhu Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xu Zhu, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86-10-8819-6059, Email [email protected]: Recently, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has also gained popularity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several studies have compared HAIC and Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, comparisons between TACE plus HAIC and HAIC are rarely reported. Here, we evaluated the performance of HepaSphere DEB-TACE combined with HAIC (Hepa-HAIC) compared to HAIC in patients with advanced HCC.Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 167 patients diagnosed with advanced HCC and treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from May 2018 to May 2022. The cohort comprised 74 patients who received HepaSphere DEB-TACE combined with HAIC-FOLFOX (Hepa-HAIC) and 93 patients who received HAIC-FOLFOX. Over 60% of patients received prior treatments. To avoid selection bias, propensity score matching was applied to the efficacy and safety analyses. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Results: Propensity-matching yielded 48 pairs, and group baselines were almost equal after matching. Median PFS and median OS were both higher in the matched Hepa-HAIC cohort (median PFS: 8.9 vs 5.8 months, p = 0.035; median OS: 22.4 vs 9.5 months, p = 0.027), which was consistent with pre-matching analysis. The ORR in the Hepa-HAIC and HAIC cohorts was 75.0% and 37.5%, respectively; the DCR was 93.8% after Hepa-HAIC and 81.3% after HAIC. There was no treatment-related death. Grade 3– 4 ALT elevation was more frequent in the Hepa-HAIC group (33.3% vs 8.3%, p = 0.003), while vomiting was more frequent in the HAIC group (29.2% vs 12.5%, p = 0.084).Conclusion: The Hepa-HAIC group is superior to the HAIC group in metrics of PFS, OS, ORR, and DCR, which indicates the combination of HepaSphere DEB-TACE and HAIC may lead to improved outcomes with a comparable safety profile in advanced HCC.Keywords: transarterial chemoembolization, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, propensity score matching

Keywords