Applied Sciences (Mar 2024)

Numerical Analysis of the Wing Leading Edge Electro-Impulse De-Icing Process Based on Cohesive Zone Model

  • Fangping Ma,
  • Zhengtao Zhu,
  • Di Wang,
  • Xiaoming Jin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072777
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 7
p. 2777

Abstract

Read online

Aircraft icing has historically been a critical cause of airplane crashes. The electro-impulse de-icing system has a wide range of applications in aircraft de-icing due to its lightweight design, low energy consumption, high efficiency, and other advantages. However, there has been little study into accurate wing electric-impulse de-icing simulation methods and the parameters impacting de-icing efficacy. Based on the damage mechanics principle and considering the influence mechanisms of interface debonding and ice fracture on ice shedding, this paper establishes a more accurate numerical model of wing electric-impulse de-icing using the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM). It simulates the process of electric-impulse de-icing at the leading edge of the NACA 0012 wing. The numerical results are compared to the experimental results, revealing that the constructed wing electro-impulse de-icing numerical model is superior. Lastly, the effects of varying ice–skin interface shear adhesion strengths, doubler loading positions, and impulse sequences on de-icing effectiveness were studied. The de-icing rate is a quantitative description of the electro-impulse’s de-icing action, defined in the numerical model as the ratio of cohesive element deletions to the total elements at the ice–skin interface. The findings reveal that varying shear adhesion strengths at the ice–skin interface significantly impact the de-icing effect. The de-icing rate steadily falls with increasing shear adhesion strength, from 66% to 56%. When two, four, and seven impulses were applied to doubler two, the de-icing rates were 59%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, significantly increasing the de-icing efficiency compared to when impulses were applied to doubler one. Doubler one and two impulse responses are overlaid differently depending on the impulse sequences, resulting in varying de-icing rates. When the impulse sequence is 20 ms, the superposition results are optimal, and the de-icing rate reaches 100%. These studies can guide the development and implementation of a wing electric-impulse de-icing system.

Keywords