Wikipedia è poco affidabile? La colpa è anche degli esperti

Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea. 2017;9(1):1-6

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea

ISSN: 2038-0925 (Online)

Publisher: Diacronie

Society/Institution: Associazione culturale Diacronie

LCC Subject Category: History (General) and history of Europe: History (General): Modern history, 1453-

Country of publisher: Italy

Language of fulltext: Spanish, French, English, Italian

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS


Cristian Cenci (è laureato in Economia e Gestione dell’Ambiente e del Turismo presso l’Università degli Studi di Trento. Si avvicina al mondo di Wikipedia nel 2007; dal 2015 è membro dello staff di Wikimedia Italia in quanto project manager di Wiki Loves Monuments, concorso fotografico internazionale dedicato alla salvaguardia dei beni culturali.)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 28 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

What kind of relationship do the historical sciences have with Wikipedia? How should a reader approach Wikipedia articles dealing with history? What role will the upcoming “free encyclopedia” play in the study and teaching of history? Starting from an analysis on some Wikipedia’s article performed by the “Nicoletta Bourbaki” working group, six authors animate a panel discussion on the relationship between the free encyclopedia and history.