Predictors of involuntary patients’ satisfaction with care: prospective study
Emma Bainbridge,
Brian Hallahan,
David McGuinness,
Patricia Gunning,
John Newell,
Agnes Higgins,
Kathy Murphy,
Colm McDonald
Affiliations
Emma Bainbridge
Honorary Clinical Fellow, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
Brian Hallahan
Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
David McGuinness
Research Nurse, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
Patricia Gunning
Clinical Research Biostatistician, HRB Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
John Newell
Professor of Biostatistics, HRB Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland Galway and School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
Professor of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway and HRB Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
BackgroundInvoluntary admission can be traumatic and is associated with negative attitudes that persist after the episode of illness has abated.AimsWe aimed to prospectively assess satisfaction with care at the points of involuntary admission and symptomatic recovery, and identify their sociodemographic, clinical and service experience predictors.MethodLevels of satisfaction with care, and clinical and sociodemographic variables were obtained from a representative cohort of 263 patients at the point of involuntary admission and from 155 of these patients 3 months after termination of the involuntary admission. Data were analysed with multiple linear regression modelling.ResultsHigher baseline awareness of illness (B = 0.19, P < 0.001) and older age (B = 0.05, P = 0.001) were associated with more satisfaction with care at baseline and follow-up. Transition to greater satisfaction with care was associated with improvements in awareness of illness (B = 0.13, P < 0.001) and in symptoms (B = 0.05, P = 0.02), as well as older age (B = 0.04, P = 0.01). Objective coercive experiences were not associated with variation in satisfaction with care.ConclusionsThere is wide variation in satisfaction with coercive care. Greater satisfaction with care is positively associated with clinical variables such as increased awareness of illness.Declaration of interestNone.