Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Dec 2023)

Prophylactic Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in High-risk Patients Undergoing Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

  • Raghavan Vidya, MS, MD, FRCS,
  • Muskaan Khosla, MS, MPH, MRCS,
  • Kim Baek, MD, MA, FRCS,
  • R. Vinayagam, FRCS,
  • Dinesh Thekkinkattil, FRCS,
  • Siobhan Laws, FRCS,
  • Stergios Douvetzemis, FRCS,
  • Tapan Sircar, MS, FRCS,
  • Amulya Mullapudi, MS,
  • John Murphy, PhD, FRCS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005488
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. e5488

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as an adjunct to reduce wound complication rates in many surgical domains. This study investigated the prophylactic use of PICO NPWT in high-risk patients undergoing oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Methods:. This was a prospective multicenter national audit. The findings were compared against Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (ABS/BAPRAS) Oncoplastic Guidelines for best practice. Results:. Data from 267 patients were included from seven centers. All patients had at least one high-risk factor for postoperative wound complications, whereas 78 patients (29.2%) had more than one. Thirty-six patients (13.5%) developed postoperative wound complications. An estimated 16 (6%) developed skin flap necrosis, wound dehiscence occurred in 13 patients (4.9%), and 15 patients (5.6%) developed postoperative wound infection. Eleven patients (4.1%) required further surgery due to wound complications. In total, 158 patients underwent mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction. Postoperative wound complication rate was comparable in this subgroup (n = 22; 13.9%). Implant loss rate was 3.8%, which was within the 5% target mentioned in the ABS/BAPRAS guidelines. The estimated total cost saving was US $105,600 (£84,613) and US $395.50 (£316.90) per patient. Wound infection rate (5.6%) was much lower than the 25% reported by both iBRA study and National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit. Conclusions:. Our study suggests that prophylactic use of NPWT in oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery results in low rates of wound-related complications with associated healthcare cost benefits in patients with high-risk factors for wound-related complications. However, a prospective randomized control trial is required.