Fluids (Aug 2022)

Field Study of Three–Parameter Flow Resistance Model in Rivers with Vegetation Patch

  • Masoud Naderi,
  • Hossein Afzalimehr,
  • Ayoub Dehghan,
  • Nader Darban,
  • Mohammad Nazari-Sharabian,
  • Moses Karakouzian

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7080284
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 8
p. 284

Abstract

Read online

Bed shear stress in coarse–bed rivers with vegetation patches is one of the challenging parameters in hydraulic engineering, mechanical engineering, fluvial morphology, and environmental studies. Based on this necessity, in this study, the values of bed shear stress in four reaches of rivers in Iran were estimated and compared using the methods of boundary layer characteristics, logarithmic law, and Darcy–Weisbach. Data collection in this study started in February 2021 and ended in April 2021. Estimation of flow resistance is a key factor in many numerical and physical models. In order to obtain a reasonable evaluation of this factor, it is necessary to measure and calculate the key variables of resistance to flow. Accordingly, the experimental design in this study includes surveying operations, velocity measurement, and sampling of bed sediments. The results show that due to bed forms, vegetation patches, and variations of flow depth and grain size in the river, the universal velocity distribution law (the log law) may not be suitable to estimate the shear velocity, which is a key parameter of flow resistance. This calls for more justifiable methods which are not affected by near–the–bed conditions. Accordingly, a three–parameter flow resistance model is presented, which shows an average error of 17%, indicating the accuracy of the model. The investigation of 71 measured velocity profiles shows the occurrence of the Dip phenomenon in the velocity profiles near the vegetation patches. However, by moving away from the vegetation patches, the effect of this phenomenon is decreased, and the profiles illustrate an S–shaped distribution. The results show that the relative differences between the logarithmic law and Darcy–Weisbach methods compared to the boundary layer characteristics method (BLCM) are equal to 87% and 39%, respectively, indicating a more reasonable agreement between the Darcy–Weisbach method and the boundary layer characteristics method. This is due to the application of key parameters of the boundary layer theory to calculate shear velocity by BLCM. However, to simplify data collection in the field, the application of the Darcy–Weisbach method is suggested.

Keywords