ERJ Open Research (Nov 2020)

Environmental contamination related to SARS-CoV-2 in ICU patients

  • Alexandra Lomont,
  • Marouane Boubaya,
  • Warda Khamis,
  • Antoine Deslandes,
  • Hugues Cordel,
  • Delphine Seytre,
  • Chakib Alloui,
  • Célie Malaure,
  • Nicolas Bonnet,
  • Etienne Carbonnelle,
  • Yves Cohen,
  • Hilario Nunes,
  • Olivier Bouchaud,
  • Jean-Ralph Zahar,
  • Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte,
  • AIRMIC study group:,
  • Jean-Ralph Zahar,
  • Etienne Carbonnelle,
  • Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte,
  • Frédéric Le Gal,
  • Frédéric Mechai,
  • Typhaine Billard-Pomares,
  • Alexandra Lomont,
  • Chakib Alloui,
  • Nerville-Emmanuel Gordien,
  • Olivier Bouchaud,
  • Johann Cailhol,
  • Sophie Brun,
  • Athenaïs Gerber,
  • Paul Deny

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00595-2020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a primary global concern, and data are lacking concerning risk of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) environmental contamination. Objective To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A prospective single centre 1-day study was carried out in an ICU. Four surfaces (the ventilator control screen, the control buttons of the syringe pump, the bed rails and the computer table located >1 m away from the patient) were systematically swabbed at least 8 h after any cleaning process. We analysed clinical, microbiological and radiological data to identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. Results 40% of ICU patients were found to contaminate their environment. No particular trend emerged regarding the type of surface contaminated. Modality of oxygen support (high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, invasive mechanical ventilation, standard oxygen mask) was not associated with the risk of environmental contamination. Univariate analysis showed that lymphopenia <0.7×109·L−1 was associated with environmental contamination. Conclusion Despite small sample size, our study generated surprising results. Modality of oxygen support is not associated with risk of environmental contamination. Further studies are needed.