International Journal of Retina and Vitreous (Aug 2023)

Fairness and generalizability of OCT normative databases: a comparative analysis

  • Luis Filipe Nakayama,
  • Lucas Zago Ribeiro,
  • Juliana Angelica Estevão de Oliveira,
  • João Carlos Ramos Gonçalves de Matos,
  • William Greig Mitchell,
  • Fernando Korn Malerbi,
  • Leo Anthony Celi,
  • Caio Vinicius Saito Regatieri

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00459-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose In supervised Machine Learning algorithms, labels and reports are important in model development. To provide a normality assessment, the OCT has an in-built normative database that provides a color base scale from the measurement database comparison. This article aims to evaluate and compare normative databases of different OCT machines, analyzing patient demographic, contrast inclusion and exclusion criteria, diversity index, and statistical approach to assess their fairness and generalizability. Methods Data were retrieved from Cirrus, Avanti, Spectralis, and Triton’s FDA-approval and equipment manual. The following variables were compared: number of eyes and patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, statistical approach, sex, race and ethnicity, age, participant country, and diversity index. Results Avanti OCT has the largest normative database (640 eyes). In every database, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were similar, including adult patients and excluding pathological eyes. Spectralis has the largest White (79.7%) proportionately representation, Cirrus has the largest Asian (24%), and Triton has the largest Black (22%) patient representation. In all databases, the statistical analysis applied was Regression models. The sex diversity index is similar in all datasets, and comparable to the ten most populous contries. Avanti dataset has the highest diversity index in terms of race, followed by Cirrus, Triton, and Spectralis. Conclusion In all analyzed databases, the data framework is static, with limited upgrade options and lacking normative databases for new modules. As a result, caution in OCT normality interpretation is warranted. To address these limitations, there is a need for more diverse, representative, and open-access datasets that take into account patient demographics, especially considering the development of supervised Machine Learning algorithms in healthcare.

Keywords