BMC Urology (Nov 2022)

Semen parameter variability among users of at-home sperm testing kits

  • Yana Aznavour,
  • Felipe Navarrete,
  • Jad Badreddine,
  • Paul H. G. Simon,
  • Vrushab Gowda,
  • Stephen Rhodes,
  • Ramy Abou Ghayda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01134-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite the generally accepted World Health Organization guidelines on semen analysis, an individual’s results can display significant variation when performed across time or in different laboratories. Semen parameters are in fact highly variable measures that can differ significantly between various analyses. Numerous researchers have discovered a wide range of semen parameters within each individual male, but only a few studies included the analysis of semen parameters variability in patients with infertility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-individual variability of semen parameters in men of reproductive age with normozoospermia and those with oligozoospermia. Methods Five hundred and thirteen who provided ≥ 2 semen samples (798 samples in total) using an at-home mail-in kit over a period of about 2 years were enrolled in the study. Semen samples collection using Give Legacy at-home mail-in semen collection kit; semen analysis at a CLIA-certified laboratory. Results The degree of intra-subject variation across all semen parameters was lower in men with normozoospermia compared to men with oligozoospermia. Men with normozoospermia furthermore demonstrated a level of intra-subject variation that was lower than inter-subject variation across all measured parameters. No association was observed between intra-subject coefficients of variation in any of the semen parameters, including sperm concentration, sperm count, motile sperm count, total motility, progressive motility, the percentage of sperm with normal morphology, and the age, duration of abstinence, and BMI of the men. Conclusion The results of this observational study confirm the significant variability in semen parameters in men with normozoospermia and oligozoospermia, as measured from at-home semen collection kit samples. This further underscore the importance of securing multiple samples for analysis to provide a robust assessment of male fertility.

Keywords