Journal of Asthma and Allergy (Apr 2022)

Real-World Effectiveness of Dupilumab for Patients with Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Study

  • Numata T,
  • Araya J,
  • Miyagawa H,
  • Okuda K,
  • Takekoshi D,
  • Hashimoto M,
  • Minagawa S,
  • Ishikawa T,
  • Hara H,
  • Kuwano K

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 395 – 405

Abstract

Read online

Takanori Numata, Jun Araya, Hanae Miyagawa, Keitaro Okuda, Daisuke Takekoshi, Mitsuo Hashimoto, Shunsuke Minagawa, Takeo Ishikawa, Hiromichi Hara, Kazuyoshi Kuwano Department of Respiratory Diseases, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Takanori Numata, Department of Respiratory Diseases, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan, Tel +81-3-3433-1111 (ext. 3271), Fax +81-3-3433-1020, Email [email protected]: Treatment with dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that blocks both the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of severe asthma (SA) with type 2 inflammation. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy of this biologic for the treatment of SA in a real-world setting.Methods: From April 2019 to December 2021, 26 Japanese patients with SA received dupilumab at Jikei University Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated the number of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, pulmonary function, maintenance dose of corticosteroids, biomarkers, and adverse events.Results: During a mean follow-up period of 12.6 months, 10 patients received dupilumab as the first biologic, and 16 switched to dupilumab from other biologics. Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced the number of annual exacerbations from 3.4 ± 4.1 to 1.6 ± 2.7 (/person-year, p < 0.01) at the last follow-up regardless of previous biologic use. The Asthma Control Test score significantly improved in all patients by six months after administration but tended to worsen by 24 months in patients with previous biologic use. On the other hand, blood eosinophil counts (BECs) transiently increased and peaked three to six months after administration. The peak timing can be affected by previous biologic use. Adverse events included wheezing immediately after injection, hypereosinophilia, mild conjunctivitis, and relapse of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia in the patient switched from benralizumab.Conclusion: Dupilumab treatment was useful for patients with SA in a real-world setting. However, the BEC should be monitored carefully, especially in patients who previously received anti-IL-5/IL-5 receptor antibody.Keywords: dupilumab, severe asthma, exacerbation, transient eosinophilia, real-world

Keywords