Clinical Interventions in Aging (Dec 2023)

Effect of Frailty on the Long-Term Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Zong M,
  • Guan X,
  • Huang W,
  • Chang J,
  • Zhang J

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 18
pp. 2021 – 2029

Abstract

Read online

Min Zong,1 Xiaonan Guan,1 Wen Huang,1 Jing Chang,2 Jianjun Zhang1 1Department of Heart Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jianjun Zhang, Department of Heart Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8th Gongtinanlu Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13601230955, Email [email protected]: To investigate the effect of frailty on the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods: The data of 238 AMI patients (aged ≥ 75 years) were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups according to the Modified Frailty Index (mFI): frailty group (mFI≥ 0.27, n=143) and non-frailty group (mFI< 0.27, n=95). The major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) and Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the two groups were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for MACEs.Results: The frailty group showed a significantly older age as well as a higher N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide level, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, and CRUSADE bleeding score compared with the non-frailty group (P< 0.05). A significantly greater proportion of patients with combined heart failure, atrial fibrillation, comorbidity, and activities of daily living score of < 60 was also observed in the frailty group compared with the non-frailty group (P< 0.05). At 36 months after AMI, the frailty group vs the non-frailty group showed a significantly poorer survival (log-rank P=0.005), higher incidence of MACEs (50.35 vs 29.47, P=0.001), higher overall mortality rate (20.98% vs 7.37%, P=0.006), higher 30-day mortality rate (13.99% vs 5.26%, P=0.033), higher major bleeding rate (14.69% vs 5.26, P=0.018), and lower repeat revascularization rate (2.10% vs 8.42%, P=0.03). Frailty, type 2 diabetes, and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide ≥ 1800 pg/mL were independent risk factors for MACEs.Conclusion: Frailty is an independent risk factor affecting the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with AMI.Keywords: myocardial infarction, frailty, MACEs, risk factors, prognosis

Keywords