Journal of Dairy Science (Sep 2024)

Evaluation of protocols to determine urine output and urinary urea nitrogen excretion in dairy cows with and without dietary salt supplementation

  • P. Letelier,
  • G.I. Zanton,
  • M.A. Wattiaux

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 107, no. 9
pp. 6742 – 6757

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: Urine output and urinary urea-N excretion (UUNe) excretion are critical measures to accurately evaluate N metabolism in lactating dairy cows and environmental concerns related to manure N. The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare estimates of UUNe, urine output, and related variables from 3 pre-established measurement protocols (bladder catheterization, external collection cup, and spot sampling) and from dietary salt supplementation, (2) to study temporal variation in UUNe, urine output, and related variables as affected by measurement protocol, and (3) to evaluate urine specific gravity as a predictor of urine output. Twelve multiparous Holstein cows were used in a split-plot, Latin square design. Cows were randomly assigned to a diet (main plot) containing either 0.7% or 1.6% NaCl (DM basis) and then assigned to a sequence of 3 protocols (subplot) in a balanced 3 × 3 Latin square with 14-d period. For each protocol, measurements were conducted every 4 h for 3 consecutive days. Urine output was determined gravimetrically for bladder catheterization and external collection cup or based on measured cow BW, measured urinary creatinine concentration, and the assumed creatinine excretion of 29 mg/kg BW per day for spot sampling. Urine specific gravity was measured by refractometry. When averaged over a 3-d measurement period and compared with bladder catheterization, spot sampling underestimated urine output (6.8 kg/d; 20%) and UUNe (26 g/d; 13%) but exhibited greater concentration of urinary urea-N (+58 mg/dL; 10%). There were no differences in any measurements determined via bladder catheterization or external cup device protocols, except for urine output that tended to be 3.7 kg/d lower for collection cup compared with bladder catheterization. The 2 gravimetric protocols yielded lower urinary creatinine concentration than spot sampling (64.7 vs. 88.1 mg/dL) and lower creatinine excretion (25.3 mg/kg BW per day) than the value of 29 mg/kg BW per day generally assumed in the spot sampling protocol. Salt supplementation tended to increase urine output (+5.2 kg/d) and decrease urinary urea-N concentration (−93 mg/dL), urinary creatinine concentration (−9.5 mg/dL), milk protein concentration (−0.19 percentage unit) and milk protein yield (−70 g/d). There was greater temporal variation of urine output when measured via the collection cup compared with bladder catheterization in the first 2 d but not the third day of sampling, suggesting that an extended period of adaptation might have improved data quality of the collection cup protocol. The R2 of the linear regression to predict urine output with urine specific gravity was 67%, 73%, and 32% for bladder catheterization, collection cup, and spot sampling, respectively. In this study, spot sampling underestimated both urine output and UUNe, but UUNe determination did not differ between external collection cup and bladder catheterization. However, our data suggested the need to investigate the adaptation protocol, required days of measurements and the conversion of urine mass to urine volume to improve accuracy and precision of urine collection protocols.

Keywords