پژوهش‌های آبخیزداری (Sep 2023)

Assessment of Ecological Quality in the Nir Watershed, Ardabil Province

  • Zeinab Hazbavi,
  • Elnaz Ghabelnezam,
  • Elham Azizi,
  • Zahra Sharifi,
  • Solmaz Fathololoumi,
  • Mohammad Reza Nikoo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22092/wmrj.2023.360357.1494
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36, no. 3
pp. 90 – 110

Abstract

Read online

Introduction and ObjectiveEcological quality is an inclusive measurement unit of the elements, configuration, and performance of an ecosystem in the temporal and spatial scales. In addition, assessing ecological quality could provide valuable information for experts and managers in the first step of directed planning and comprehensive watershed management. Therefore, the current research was conducted to calculate the ecological quality index (EQI) in one of the upland watersheds of Yamchi Dam, which is not without the effect of human interference.Materials and MethodsNir Watershed as a study area is located in the southwestern part of Ardabil Province. To carry out the current research, first, the essential variables of ecological quality assessment (normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), fractional vegetation coverage (FVC), leaf area index (LAI), net primary production (NPP), moisture index (IM), land surface temperature (LST), soil erosion, ecological integrity index, and runoff retention index) were collected and calculated. The variables were chosen to represent the three functions of ecosystems maintaining, supporting, and regulating. After standardization, weighting of the variables was done using the advanced multi-criteria, i.e., Projection Pursuit Model (PPM). Afterward, the EQI was calculated based on the sum weight of all variables for 11 sub-watersheds of Nir.Results and DiscussionThe wide range of variability of the variables used in the entire Nir Watershed area was confirmed. In general, sub-watershed 1 had the maximum mean of the first to fourth variables (FVC, NDVI, NPP, and LAI) and the minimum mean LST. While sub-watershed 11 had the opposite situation in terms of these five variables. All five variables reflect the structure and function of vegetation and therefore the ecological quality. The status of other indicators except ecological continuity (EC) was also evaluated in sub-watershed 1 in a medium status. Based on the PPM weighting method, the FVC (0.39) has the highest importance, and moisture and runoff retention indices with an equal weight of 0.01 have been assigned the least priority. In addition, the ecological quality results showed that watersheds 11 (0.10) and 1 (0.90) respectively have the lowest and highest levels of EQI. In general, according to the zoning resultd, it was found that the northeastern and southeastern parts of the watershed have the lowest EQI which covered 29% of the area.Conclusion and SuggestionsThe results can be used as one of the main goals of managing watersheds regarding preserving the ecosystem's health and integrity. Moreover, the priority of rehabilitation budget allocation can be assigned according to the resilience degrees of studied sub-watersheds.

Keywords