Remote Sensing (Sep 2021)

Monitoring the Work Cycles of Earthmoving Excavators in Earthmoving Projects Using UAV Remote Sensing

  • Yiguang Wu,
  • Meizhen Wang,
  • Xuejun Liu,
  • Ziran Wang,
  • Tianwu Ma,
  • Zhimin Lu,
  • Dan Liu,
  • Yujia Xie,
  • Xiuquan Li,
  • Xing Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193853
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 19
p. 3853

Abstract

Read online

Monitoring the work cycles of earthmoving excavators is an important aspect of construction productivity assessment. Currently, the most advanced method for the recognition of work cycles is the “Stretching-Bending” Sequential Pattern (SBSP), which is based on fixed-carrier video monitoring (FC-SBSP). However, the application of this method presupposes the availability of preconstructed installation carriers to act as a surveillance camera as well as installed and commissioned surveillance systems that work in tandem with them. Obviously, this method is difficult to apply to projects with no conditions for a monitoring camera installation or which have a short construction time. This highlights the potential application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) remote sensing, which is flexible and mobile. Unfortunately, few studies have been conducted on the application of UAV remote sensing for the work cycle monitoring of earthmoving excavators. This research is necessary because the use of UAV remote sensing for monitoring the work cycles of earthmoving excavators can improve construction productivity and save time and costs, especially in post-disaster reconstruction projects involving harsh construction environments, and emergency projects with short construction periods. In addition, the challenges posed by UAV shaking may have to be taken into account when using the SBSP for UAV remote sensing. To this end, this study used application experiments in which stabilization processing of UAV video data was performed for UAV shaking. The application experimental results show that the work cycle performance of UAV remote-sensing-based SBSP (UAV-SBSP) for UAV video data was 2.45% and 5.36% lower in terms of precision and recall, respectively, without stabilization processing than after stabilization processing. Comparative experiments were also designed to investigate the applicability of the SBSP oriented toward UAV remote sensing. Comparative experimental results show that the same level of performance was obtained for the recognition of work cycles with the UAV-SBSP as compared with the FC-SBSP, demonstrating the good applicability of this method. Therefore, the results of this study show that UAV remote sensing enables effective monitoring of earthmoving excavator work cycles in construction sites where monitoring cameras are not available for installation, and it can be used as an alternative technology to fixed-carrier video monitoring for onsite proximity monitoring.

Keywords