Frontiers in Neuroscience (Nov 2024)

Comparison of dry and wet electroencephalography for the assessment of cognitive evoked potentials and sensor-level connectivity

  • Nina M. Ehrhardt,
  • Clara Niehoff,
  • Anna-Christina Oßwald,
  • Daria Antonenko,
  • Guglielmo Lucchese,
  • Guglielmo Lucchese,
  • Robert Fleischmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1441799
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMultipin dry electrodes (dry EEG) provide faster and more convenient application than wet EEG, enabling extensive data collection. This study aims to compare task-related time-frequency representations and resting-state connectivity between wet and dry EEG methods to establish a foundation for using dry EEG in investigations of brain activity in neuropsychiatric disorders.MethodsIn this counterbalanced cross-over study, we acquired wet and dry EEG in 33 healthy participants [n = 22 females, mean age (SD) = 24.3 (± 3.4) years] during resting-state and an auditory oddball paradigm. We computed mismatch negativity (MMN), theta power in task EEG, and connectivity measures from resting-state EEG using phase lag index (PLI) and minimum spanning tree (MST). Agreement between wet and dry EEG was assessed using Bland–Altman bias.ResultsMMN was detectable with both systems in time and frequency domains, but dry EEG underestimated MMN mean amplitude, peak latency, and theta power compared to wet EEG. Resting-state connectivity was reliably estimated with dry EEG using MST diameter in all except the very low frequencies (0.5–4 Hz). PLI showed larger differences between wet and dry EEG in all frequencies except theta.ConclusionDry EEG reliably detected MMN and resting-state connectivity despite a lower signal-to-noise ratio. This study provides the methodological basis for using dry EEG in studies investigating the neural processes underlying psychiatric and neurological conditions.

Keywords