PLoS ONE (Jan 2015)

A cross-cultural perspective on the preference for potential effect: an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis approach.

  • Xiaomin Sun,
  • Dan Xu,
  • Fang Luo,
  • Zihan Wei,
  • Cong Wei,
  • Gang Xue

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124170
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
p. e0124170

Abstract

Read online

A recent paper [Tormala ZL, Jia JS, Norton MI (2012). The preference for potential. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103: 567-583] demonstrated that persons often prefer potential rather than achievement when evaluating others, because information regarding potential evokes greater interest and processing, resulting in more favorable evaluations. This research aimed to expand on this finding by asking two questions: (a) Is the preference for potential effect replicable in other cultures? (b) Is there any other mechanism that accounts for this preference for potential? To answer these two questions, we replicated Tormala et al.'s study in multiple cities (17 studies with 1,128 participants) in China using an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis approach to test our hypothesis. Our results showed that the preference for potential effect found in the US is also robust in China. Moreover, we also found a pro-youth bias behind the preference for potential effect. To be specific, persons prefer a potential-oriented applicant rather than an achievement-oriented applicant, partially because they believe that the former is younger than the latter.