BMC Cancer (Feb 2021)

Prognostic value of visual residual tumour cells (VRTC) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery

  • Xingxing Wang,
  • Hao Wang,
  • Haixing Wang,
  • Jie Huang,
  • Xin Wang,
  • Zhengzeng Jiang,
  • Lijie Tan,
  • Dongxian Jiang,
  • Yingyong Hou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07779-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background We assessed visual residual tumour cells (VRTC) with both Becker’s tumour regression grading (TRG) system and Japanese TRG system in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Methods We compared Becker system and Japanese system in 175 ESCC patients treated between 2009 and 2015. Results According to Becker system, the 5-year DFS/DSS rates were 70.0%/89.3, 53.8%/56.7, 43.0%/49.0, and 42.4%/39.1% for TRG 1a (VRTC 0), TRG 1b (1–10%), TRG 2 (11–50%), and TRG 3 (> 50%). According to Japanese system, the rates were 38.8%/34.1, 49.5%/58.7, 50.2%/49.0 and 70.0%/89.3% for Grade 0-1a (VRTC> 66.6%), Grade 1b (33.3–66.6%), Grade 2 (1–33.3%) and Grade 3 (0). TRG according to two systems significantly discriminate the patients’ prognosis. TRG according to Becker system (HR 2.662, 95% CI 1.151–6.157), and lymph node metastasis (HR 2.567, 95% CI 1.442–4.570) were independent parameters of DSS. Conclusions Both Becker and Japanese system had their advantage in risk stratification of these ESCC patients. It was speculated that dividing 1–10% VRTC into a group might contribute to independently prognostic significance of Becker’s TRG system. Therefore, in addition to TRG of different systems, the percentage of VRTC might be recommended in the pathologic report, which could make the results more comparable among different researches, and more understandable for oncologists in the clinical practice.

Keywords