ESC Heart Failure (Jun 2024)

Loop diuretic down‐titration at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure

  • François Croset,
  • Pau Llàcer,
  • Julio Núñez,
  • Jorge Campos,
  • Marina García,
  • Alberto Pérez,
  • Cristina Fernández,
  • Martín Fabregate,
  • Genoveva López,
  • Susana Tello,
  • José María Fernández,
  • Raúl Ruiz,
  • Luis Manzano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14749
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
pp. 1739 – 1747

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aims The current literature provides limited guidance on the best diuretic strategy post‐hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF). It is postulated that the efficacy and safety of the outpatient diuretic regimen may be significantly influenced by the degree of fluid overload (FO) encountered during hospitalization. We hypothesize that in patients with more pronounced FO, reducing their regular oral diuretic dosage might be associated with an elevated risk of unfavourable clinical outcomes. Methods and results It was a retrospective observational study of 410 patients hospitalized for AHF in which the dose of furosemide at admission and discharge was collected. Patients were categorized across diuretic dose status into two groups: (i) the down‐titration group and (ii) the stable/up‐titration group. FO status was evaluated by a clinical congestion score and circulating biomarkers. The endpoint of interest was the composite of time to all‐cause death and/or heart failure readmission. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was constructed to analyse the endpoints. The median age was 86 (78–92) years, 256 (62%) were women, and 80% had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. After multivariate adjustment, the down‐titration furosemide equivalent dose remained not associated with the risk of the combined endpoint in the whole sample (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.86–2.06, P = 0.184). The risk of the combination of death and/or worsening heart failure associated with the diuretic strategy at discharge was significantly influenced by FO status, including clinical congestion scores and circulating proxies of FO like BNP and cancer antigen 125. Conclusions In patients hospitalized for AHF, furosemide down‐titration does not imply an increased risk of mortality and/or heart failure readmission. However, FO status modifies the effect of down‐titration on the outcome. In patients with severe congestion or residual congestion at discharge, down‐titration was associated with an increased risk of mortality and/or heart failure readmission.

Keywords