Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute, Helsinki
Sari Kytölä
Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki
Ida Vänttinen
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Tanja Ruokoranta
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Amanda Ranta
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Jani Huuhtanen
Hematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Minna Suvela
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Alun Parsons
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Annasofia Holopainen
Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio
Anu Partanen
Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio
Milla E.L. Kuusisto
Department of Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; Department of Hematology, University of Oulu, Oulu
Sirpa Koskela
Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
Riikka Räty
Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki
Maija Itälä-Remes
Department of Clinical Hematology, Turku University Hospital, Turku
Imre Västrik
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Olli Dufva
Hematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Sanna Siitonen
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital
Kimmo Porkka
Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland; Hematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Krister Wennerberg
Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
Caroline A. Heckman
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
Pia Ettala
Department of Clinical Hematology, Turku University Hospital, Turku
Marja Pyörälä
Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio
Johanna Rimpiläinen
Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
Timo Siitonen
Department of Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu
Mika Kontro
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki
The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has revolutionized the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients not benefiting from intensive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, treatment failure remains a challenge, and predictive markers are needed, particularly for relapsed or refractory AML. Ex vivo drug sensitivity testing may correlate with outcomes, but its prospective predictive value remains unexplored. Here we report the results of the first stage of the prospective phase II VenEx trial evaluating the utility and predictiveness of venetoclax sensitivity testing using different cell culture conditions and cell viability assays in patients receiving venetoclax-azacitidine. Participants with de novo AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, relapsed or refractory AML, or secondary AML were included. The primary endpoint was the treatment response in participants showing ex vivo sensitivity and the key secondary endpoints were the correlation of sensitivity with responses and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity testing was successful in 38/39 participants. Experimental conditions significantly influenced the predictive accuracy. Blast-specific venetoclax sensitivity measured in conditioned medium most accurately correlated with treatment outcomes; 88% of sensitive participants achieved a treatment response. The median survival was significantly longer for participants who were ex vivo-sensitive to venetoclax (14.6 months for venetoclax-sensitive patients vs. 3.5 for venetoclax-insensitive patients, P<0.001). This analysis illustrates the feasibility of integrating drug-response profiling into clinical practice and demonstrates excellent predictivity. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04267081.