Journal of Composites Science (Jan 2023)

The Influence of Thermomechanical Compaction on the Marginal Adaptation of 4 Different Hydraulic Sealers: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study

  • Alessio Zanza,
  • Rodolfo Reda,
  • Elisa Vannettelli,
  • Orlando Donfrancesco,
  • Michela Relucenti,
  • Shilpa Bhandi,
  • Shankargouda Patil,
  • Deepak Mehta,
  • Jogikalmat Krithikadatta,
  • Luca Testarelli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010010
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
p. 10

Abstract

Read online

Since there are no data in the literature regarding the comparison of the marginal adaptation of hydraulic sealers when used with a single-cone technique or through thermomechanical compaction, this study aimed to evaluate the behavior of four different endodontic sealers used with the two above-mentioned obturation techniques by evaluating the marginal gap existing between the obturation materials and the dentinal walls through scanning electron microscopy. Given this objective, a total of 104 single-rooted, straight canal teeth were selected and divided into four subgroups according to the selected endodontic sealer ((AH) Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHP), EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow (ES), C-Root SP (CR), and GuttaFlow Bioseal (GF)). Each tooth was decoronated and instrumented with the HyFlex EDM/CM systematics up to 30.04. After irrigation procedures, the teeth of each subgroup were divided into two groups and obturated according to two different obturation techniques: the single-cone technique (SC) and the thermomechanical compaction technique (TC). After the required sealer setting time, each tooth was sectioned in three parts at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, and each section was observed with a scanning electron microscope. The marginal gap of each sample was measured using G* Power Software v3.1, and the statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a post hoc Dunn’s test. Results showed that there were not any statistically significant differences in terms of the marginal gap between the two different above-mentioned obturation techniques for each sealer, except for the middle third of root canals, where a statistically significant difference was found for AHP, ES, and GF sealers. In conclusion, the thermomechanical compaction of hydraulic sealers and gutta-percha guarantees better sealing than the single-cone technique when the root canal shape is not rounded.

Keywords