PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants.

  • Bryce R Christensen,
  • Chad M Becnel,
  • Leland P Chan,
  • Paul D Minetos,
  • John F Clarke,
  • Marc J Kahn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 12
p. e0244147

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundDual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant's competitivity for a residency.ObjectiveThis study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes.MethodsUtilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017-2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student's t-test and chi-squared analysis.ResultsCompared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students.ConclusionsDespite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity.