Comparison of supraglottic airway device and endotracheal tube in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Abstract To date, endotracheal tube (ETT) remains the mainstream for preterm infants receiving general anesthesia. We aim to compare the perioperative respiratory adverse events between using supraglottic airway device (SAD) and ETT in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia. Former preterm infants below 52 weeks of postmenstrual age scheduled for herniorrhaphy were randomized to receive SAD or ETT for general anesthesia. Infants with severe congenital cardiopulmonary disease, prolonged oxygen or mechanical ventilation dependence, and recent respiratory tract infection were excluded. Muscle relaxant agents and opioids were avoided in this study. 40 infants were assigned into SAD or ETT groups. Infants in the SAD group had a much lower rate of intraoperative desaturation than those in the ETT group (21.1% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.003). Incidences of other intraoperative and postoperative 24-h respiratory adverse events were similar between groups, including laryngospasm/bronchospasm, cough and stridor during anesthesia, and postoperative apnea, bradycardia, and supplemental oxygen use. All participants were extubated successfully in the operation room. SAD is recommended in former preterm infants receiving general anesthesia for herniorrhaphy in their early infancy as it much decreases the incidence of intraoperative desaturation compared to ETT.

Keywords

• Supraglottic airway device
• Endotracheal intubation
• General anesthesia
• Newborn
• Premature
• Herniorrhaphy