Frontiers in Immunology (Jun 2021)

Atezolizumab Monotherapy or Plus Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

  • Dan-Ni Li,
  • Dan-Ni Li,
  • Dan-Ni Li,
  • Wen-Qing Lu,
  • Wen-Qing Lu,
  • Wen-Qing Lu,
  • Bo-Wen Yang,
  • Bo-Wen Yang,
  • Bo-Wen Yang,
  • Ling-Yun Zhang,
  • Ling-Yun Zhang,
  • Ling-Yun Zhang,
  • Bo Jin,
  • Bo Jin,
  • Bo Jin,
  • Shuo Wang,
  • Shuo Wang,
  • Shuo Wang,
  • Xiao-Fang Che,
  • Xiao-Fang Che,
  • Xiao-Fang Che,
  • Ce Li,
  • Ce Li,
  • Ce Li,
  • Yun-Peng Liu,
  • Yun-Peng Liu,
  • Yun-Peng Liu,
  • Xiu-Juan Qu,
  • Xiu-Juan Qu,
  • Xiu-Juan Qu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.666909
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundAtezolizumab plus chemotherapy has been recommended as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) irrespective of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) of subtracting chemotherapy from the combination for patients with high PD-L1 expression. Thus, we performed an indirect comparison between atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and atezolizumab alone.MethodsA total of five eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central controlled trial registries, using keywords including atezolizumab, PD-1, PD-L1, NSCLC, and RCT. The clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and TRAEs were extracted and evaluated. Using indirect analysis, the efficacy and TRAEs were compared between arm A (atezolizumab plus chemotherapy) and arm C (atezolizumab), linked by arm B (chemotherapy).ResultsDirect comparison revealed that both atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (HR 0.65, P = 0.003) and atezolizumab alone (HR 0.59, P = 0.010) significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy. More importantly, the indirect comparison showed that atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was not superior to atezolizumab regarding OS (RR 1.10, P =0.695) and ORR (RR 1.11, P = 0.645). However, patients who received atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy experienced more ≥ grade 3 TRAEs (RR 4.23, P<0.001) and TRAEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR 3.60, P<0.001) than those treated with atezolizumab monotherapy.ConclusionsAtezolizumab monotherapy might be a better treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression than atezolizumab plus chemotherapy.

Keywords