BMJ Open (Apr 2022)

Effect of different oesophagojejunostomy methods on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with self-pulling and latter transected technique: study protocol for a randomised trial

  • Jian Wang,
  • Jun Hong,
  • Ya-Ping Wang,
  • Yujen Tseng,
  • Lu-Chun Hua,
  • Han-Kun Hao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058844
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the detection rate of proximal gastric cancer has been increasing. Currently, surgical resection using gastrectomy and proper perigastric lymphadenectomy is the only treatment option to enhance the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. However, totally LTG (TLTG) is only performed by a few surgeons due to difficulty associated with oesophagojejunostomy (OJ), in which there is no consensus on a standardised anastomosis technique. We propose a randomised trial to compare functional end-to-end anastomosis (FETE) and side-to-side anastomosis (Overlap) for OJ.Methods and analysis A prospective, randomised, open-label, single-centre, interventional trial has been designed to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) outcomes and safety of FETE and Overlap, with a 1-year follow-up as the primary endpoint. The trial began in 2020 and is scheduled to enrol 96 patients according to a previous sample size calculation. Patients were randomly allocated to the FETE or Overlap groups with a follow-up of 1 year to assess QoL after the procedure. All relevant clinical data including biological markers were collected. The primary indicator is the D-value between the postoperative and preoperative QoL. Student’s t-tests will be used to compare continuous variables, while χ2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests will be used to compare categorical variables. Statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS V.23.0 statistical software. A p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Hospital Institutional Review Board of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (2020-1055). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ChiCTR2000035583.