Systematic Reviews (Sep 2020)

Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol

  • Jenna L. Hollis,
  • Emma Doherty,
  • Julia Dray,
  • Danika Tremain,
  • Mandy Hunter,
  • Karen Takats,
  • Christopher M. Williams,
  • Henry Murray,
  • Craig E. Pennell,
  • Belinda Tully,
  • John Wiggers,
  • Justine B. Daly,
  • Melanie Kingsland

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01453-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors. Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence and possible interactive health effects of such health behaviours in pregnancy, antenatal interventions that support pregnant women to improve multiple SNAP behaviours have a greater potential impact on the health outcomes of women and their children than interventions addressing single behaviours. The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered as part of antenatal care that aim to improve multiple SNAP behaviours among pregnant women. Methods Seven electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible studies. Eligible studies will include those where pregnant women are attending antenatal care. Studies that examine the effect of an intervention that addresses multiple SNAP behaviours (≥ 2 behaviours) during pregnancy and are delivered or instigated through antenatal care in a healthcare service will be included. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RCTs, cluster RCTs, stepped-wedge RCTs and non-randomised control trials will be eligible. Studies that include a no-intervention control, wait-list control group, standard/usual care, or another active single behavioural intervention (e.g. addressing one behaviour only) will be considered. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer if required. A random effects model will be used to synthesise the results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarising effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. Discussion The review will synthesise the evidence on the effect of interventions that address multiple SNAP behaviours in antenatal care and will help researchers, policy-makers and health services to develop and deliver best practice integrated models of antenatal care that have the potential to impact on both the short- and long-term health outcomes for women and their children. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018095315

Keywords