Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Aug 2016)

Single-Stage Bipedicle Local Tissue Transfer and Skin Graft for Achilles Tendon and Posterior Heel Wound Complications

  • Travis J. Dekker MD,
  • Andrew P. Matson MD,
  • Suhail K. Mithani,
  • Samuel B. Adams MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00276
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1

Abstract

Read online

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Achilles tendon and posterior heel wound complications are difficult to treat. These typically require soft tissue coverage via microvascular free tissue transfer at a tertiary referral center. Here we describe coverage of a series of posterior heel and achilles wounds via simple, local tissue transfer, a bipedicle fasciocutaneous flap. This surgical technique can be performed by an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon without resources of tertiary/specialized care or microvascular support. Methods: Three patients with separate pathologies were treated with a single-stage bipedicle fasciocutaneous local tissue transfer. Case 1 was a patient with wound breakdown following midsubstance Achilles tendon repair. Case 2 was a patient with insertional wound breakdown after Achilles debridement and repair to the calcaneus. Case 3 was a heel venous stasis ulcer with calcaneal exposure in a diabetic vasculopath. All three cases were treated with the following technique: an incision was immediately posterior to the lateral malleolus. The length of the incision was approximately 25% greater than the proximal to distal measurement of the wound. The dissection was carried to the flexor retinaculum and carried posteriorly to create a fasciocutaneous flap attached proximally and distally. This flap was then mobilized posteriorly to close the desired defect, leaving an ellipsoid shaped skin defect laterally. A split thickness skin graft was used to cover the defect created by the flap transposition. Results: All three patients demonstrated initial complete healing of the posterior defect, lateral ankle skin graft recipient site, and the skin graft donor site following surgery. Case 3 had a subsequent recurrent ulceration after initial healing. This was superficial and healed with local wound care. All patients regained full preoperative range of motion and were able to ambulate independently without modified footwear. Conclusion: The bipedicled fasciocutaneous flap described offers a simple, predictable single stage procedure that can be accomplished by an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon without resources of a tertiary care center for posterior foot and ankle defects. This flap allows for relatively short operative times and can be customized to facilitate defect coverage. Ultimately, the flap is sufficiently durable to withstand the local tissue stresses required for ambulation at an early stage. This provides a reasonable alternative to complicated and time consuming microvascular reconstruction, but does require careful follow-up to manage the patient’s underlying comorbid conditions that may complicate wound healing.