Does the setting for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for management of overactive bladder matter?

Abstract

Introduction: Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections, to treat idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB), can be performed in the office setting under local analgesia alone or in the operating room (OR) under local and/or sedation. The objective of this study was to compare the symptomatic improvement in patients with OAB who underwent treatment with intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections in an in-office versus the OR setting. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of women with the diagnosis of refractory non-neurogenic OAB who elected to undergo treatment with intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections between January 2015 and December 2020. The electronic medical records were queried for all the demographic and peri-procedural data, including the report of subjective improvement post procedure. Patients were categorized as either “in-office” versus “OR” based on the setting in which they underwent their procedure. Results: Five hundred and thirty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria: 297 (55%) in the in-office group and 242 (45%) in the OR group. A total of 30 (5.6%) patients reported retention after their procedure and it was more common in the in-office group (8.1%) versus the OR group (2.5%), (P = 0.003). The rate of urinary tract infection within 6 months of the procedure was higher in the OR group (26.0% vs. 16.8%, P = 0.009). The overall subjective improvement rate was 77% (95% confidence interval: 73%–80%). Patients in the OR group had a higher reported improvement as compared to the in-office group (81.4% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.03). Conclusions: In this cohort study of patients with OAB undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, post procedural subjective improvement was high regardless of the setting in which the procedure was performed.