Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (May 2023)

Re-recognize early recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation

  • Kaixuan Fu,
  • Xuefeng Zhu,
  • Hongxia Chu,
  • Lin Zhong,
  • Zhen Wang,
  • Wenjing Li,
  • Chunxiao Wang,
  • Jianping Li,
  • Lei Gong,
  • Guangqiang Wang,
  • Rao Yao,
  • Lihong Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1145695
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

AimsFew studies on early recurrence (ER) focused on patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate the characteristics and clinical significance of ER in patients with persistent AF after catheter ablation (CA).MethodsA total of 348 consecutive patients who underwent first-time CA for persistent and long-standing persistent AF between January 2019 and May 2022 were investigated.ResultsAbout 5/348 (1.44%) patients who failed to convert to sinus rhythm after CA were excluded. A total of 110/343 (32.1%) patients had ER, in which 98 (89.1%) were persistent and 50.9% occurred in the first 24 h after CA. Compared with the patients without ER, those with ER were more likely to have late recurrence (LR) (92.7% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) during a median follow-up of 13 (IQR 6–23) months. ER was the most significant independent predictor for LR (OR 120.5, 95% CI 41.5–349.8, P < 0.001). ER as atrial flutter (AFL) had a lower risk of LR when compared with ER as AF (P = 0.011) and both AF and AFL (P = 0.003). Early intervention of the patient with ER improved the short-term outcomes (P < 0.001), not long-term outcomes. Only 22/251 (8.76%) patients of LR appears among those who had no recurrence in the first month.ConclusionsPatients with persistent AF may not have a blanking period but rather have a risk period. Clinical significance of the blanking period should be given differential treatment between paroxysmal AF and persistent AF.

Keywords