BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Jul 2022)

End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service

  • Charlotte Quintens,
  • Willy E. Peetermans,
  • Lorenz Van der Linden,
  • Peter Declercq,
  • Bart Van den Bosch,
  • Isabel Spriet

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. Methods An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. Results A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. Conclusions The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative.

Keywords