Ophthalmology Science (Jun 2021)

Quantification of Nonperfusion Area in Montaged Widefield OCT Angiography Using Deep Learning in Diabetic Retinopathy

  • Yukun Guo, MS,
  • Tristan T. Hormel, PhD,
  • Liqin Gao, MD, PhD,
  • Qisheng You, MD, PhD,
  • Bingjie Wang, PhD,
  • Christina J. Flaxel, MD,
  • Steven T. Bailey, MD,
  • Dongseok Choi, PhD,
  • David Huang, MD, PhD,
  • Thomas S. Hwang, MD,
  • Yali Jia, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 2
p. 100027

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To examine the efficacy of a deep learning-based algorithm to quantify the nonperfusion area (NPA) on montaged widefield OCT angiography (OCTA) for assessment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: One hundred thirty-seven participants with a full range of DR severity and 26 healthy participants. Methods: A deep learning-based algorithm was developed for detecting and quantifying NPA in the superficial vascular complex on widefield OCTA comprising 3 horizontally montaged 6 × 6-mm OCTA scans from the nasal, macular, and temporal regions. We trained the algorithm on 978 volumetric OCTA scans from all participants using 5-fold cross-validation. The algorithm can distinguish NPA from shadow artifacts. The F1 score evaluated segmentation accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity with specificity fixed at 95% quantified network performance to distinguish patients with diabetes from healthy control participants, referable DR from nonreferable DR (nonproliferative DR [NPDR] less than moderate severity), and severe DR (severe NPDR, proliferative DR, or DR with edema) from nonsevere DR (mild to moderate NPDR). Main Outcome Measures: Widefield OCTA NPA, visual acuity (VA), and DR severities. Results: Automatically segmented NPA showed high agreement with the manually delineated ground truth, with a mean ± standard deviation F1 score of 0.78 ± 0.05 in nasal, 0.82 ± 0.07 in macular, and 0.78 ± 0.05 in temporal scans. The extrafoveal avascular area (EAA) in the macular scan showed the best sensitivity at 54% for differentiating those with diabetes from healthy control participants, whereas montaged widefield OCTA scan showed significantly higher sensitivity than macular scans (P < 0.0001, McNemar’s test) for detecting eyes with DR at 66%, referable DR at 63%, and severe DR at 62%. Montaged widefield OCTA showed the highest correlation (Spearman ρ = 0.74; P < 0.0001) between EAA and DR severity. The macular scan showed the strongest negative correlation (Pearson ρ = –0.42; P < 0.0001) between EAA and best-corrected VA. Conclusions: A deep learning-based algorithm for montaged widefield OCTA can detect NPA accurately and can improve the detection of clinically important DR.

Keywords