BMC Pulmonary Medicine (Apr 2023)

Role of skip N2 lymph node metastasis for patients with the stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

  • Shize Wang,
  • Shaonan Xie,
  • Yaqing Han,
  • Maogang Gao,
  • Xin Su,
  • Qingyi Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02437-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose Recent studies have indicated some differences in the prognosis of patients with stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma, and the prognosis of patients with skip N2 lymph node metastasis (SKN2) is good. This study grouped patients with stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma by propensity score matching (PSM) to evaluate the impact of SKN2 on the prognosis of these patients. Methods The clinical data for patients who underwent radical lobectomy and had a postoperative pathological diagnosis of stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma at our centre from 2016 to 2018 were collected, and PSM was performed at a ratio of 1:1. Results A total of 456 patients were enrolled in this study. After PSM, 112 patients were included in the SKN2 group, and 112 patients were included in the non-SKN2 group. When comparing the SKN2 group with the non-SKN2 group, the 3-year OS rate was (71.4% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001), and the 3-year DFS rate was (35.7% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001). It is further divided into four groups:single-station SKN2 (N2a1),Multi-station SKN2 (N2a2),single-station non-SKN2 (N2b1) and Multi-station non-SKN2 (N2b2).The 3-year OS and DFS rates of skip lymph node metastasis were better than those of non-skip lymph node metastasis(OS:N2a1 vs. N2b1 68.4% vs. 23.5%,p < 0.001;N2a2 vs. N2b2 73.0% vs. 7.7%,p < 0.001)(DFS:N2a1 vs. N2b1 68.4% vs. 5.9%,p < 0.001;N2a2 vs. N2b2 62.2% vs. 5.1%,p < 0.001), regardless of the number of N2 station(OS:N2a1 vs. N2a2 68.4% vs. 73.0%,p = 0.584;N2b1 vs. N2b2 23.5% vs. 7.7%,p = 0.051). On multivariate analysis, sex (p = 0.008) ,Vascular tumour thrombus(p = 0.047),size(p = 0.002)and SKN2 (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of OS. Conclusion For patients with stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma, the prognosis of SKN2 patients is better than non-SKN2 patients’, and SKN2 may be used as an important factor in the N2 subgroup classification in future TNM staging.

Keywords