Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology (Jan 2012)

Indicators of Safety Compromise in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

  • Mark R Borgaonkar,
  • Lawrence Hookey,
  • Roger Hollingworth,
  • Ernst J Kuipers,
  • Alan Forster,
  • David Armstrong,
  • Alan Barkun,
  • Ronald Bridges,
  • Rose Carter,
  • Chris de Gara,
  • Catherine Dube,
  • Robert Enns,
  • Donald MacIntosh,
  • Sylviane Forget,
  • Grigorios Leontiadis,
  • Jonathan Meddings,
  • Peter Cotton,
  • Roland Valori,
  • on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Safety and Quality Indicators in Endoscopy Consensus Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/782790
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 2
pp. 71 – 78

Abstract

Read online

The growth in the use of endoscopy to diagnose and treat many gastointestinal disorders, and its central role in cancer screening programs, has led to a significant increase in the number of procedures performed. This growth, however, has also led to many variations in, among others, the provision of services, the choice of sedative medications and the training of providers. The recognition of the significance of quality in endoscopy has prompted several countries, including Canada, to initiate efforts to adopt nationwide quality improvement programs. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology formed a committee to review endoscopy and quality with the aim of stimulating improvement. This article focuses specifically on patient safety indicators that were developed at a consensus conference aimed at generating a broad range of recommendations for selected endoscopic procedures, which if adopted, could lead to significant changes in how endoscopy services are provided.